[Oak_]

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326776524_De_Pulchritudine_non_est_Disputandum_A_cross-cultural_investigation_of_the_alleged_intersubjective_validity_of_aesthetic_judgment

Since at least Hume and Kant, philosophers working on the nature of aesthetic judgment have generally agreed that common sense does not treat aesthetic judgments in the same way as typical expressions of subjective preferences—rather, it endows them with intersubjective validity, the property of being right or wrong regardless of disagreement. Moreover, this apparent intersubjective validity has been taken to constitute one of the main explananda for philosophical accounts of aesthetic judgment. But is it really the case that most people spontaneously treat aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity? In this paper, we report the results of a cross‐cultural study with over 2,000 respondents spanning 19 countries. Despite significant geographical variations, these results suggest that most people do not treat their own aesthetic judgments as having intersubjective validity.

Czyżby szykowała się rewolucja w estetyce?

#filozofia #estetyka

[Oak_]

Jeszcze jakby kogoś to interesowało to znalazłem krytykę filozofii eksperymentalnej i wymienionego artykułu Cova, Pain (2012) przez Zangwilla: https://www.academia.edu/37770867/Beauty_and_the_Agreeable_A_Critique_of_Experimental_Aesthetics (lepszego za free nie znalazłem)

No i odpowiedź samego zainteresowanego na podobne zarzuty: https://www.unige.ch/fapse/e3lab/files/4815/4081/0848/Cova_2018_PhiloPsych.pdf

+ tutaj: https://psyarxiv.com/hgvwr/ Cova się odwołuje do powyższej krytyki Zangwilla

Wołam @Croce i @parrezja jako, że zaplusowali główny post.