Wpis z mikrobloga

Chciałem wszystkich przestrzec przed @GabrielGarciaMoreno, który dodaje pseudonaukę pod tagami #gruparatowaniapoziomu i #depresja, a później wrzuca na czarną listę osobę, która napisała odpowiedź -> https://www.wykop.pl/wpis/51737001

Komentarz, którego już nie mogłem dodać:

Opisy błędów metodologicznych są w powyższych linkach (+ źródła). Swoją drogą napisałeś, że "podobne badania pod tezę pozytywności obejmują jeszcze mniejsze grupy" - brednie. W tym badaniu było 20 par, z czego tylko 3 par gejów - nie da się nawet stwierdzić, czy te dzieci były wychowywane w tych parach, gdyż mowa tutaj o sytuacjach, w których para heteroseksualna się rozwiodła, a drugi rodzic później wszedł w związek jednopłciowy.

Odnośnie błędów:

Sullins achieves this through a crucial elision between households in which a child spent some time in a home headed by a same-sex couple and families in which a child was actually raised, from birth, by a stable same-sex couple, a situation more auspicious for healthy child development. This conflation of household stability with parent gender fatally mars his conclusions, which are much more damning of gay and lesbian parenting than are warranted by his data.

Sullins claims that his study examines “children raised by same-sex parents into early adulthood.” But in fact, he has zero basis to draw this conclusion, as he is applying a wholly untenable definition of “raised by.” All he knows about his dataset is that his subjects, who ranged in age from 12 to 18, spent some of their teenage years with a parent who at some point had a same-sex partner. Since we do not know if that partner was ever actually a parent, legally or otherwise, it is inaccurate to characterize such households as “same-sex parented” as Sullins does eleven times.

Not only is there no basis to conclude that these subjects were raised by same-sex parents, but also there is every reason to believe they likely were not.

This descriptor, of course, is the key variable in the discourse on optimal child-rearing because of the well-established fact that children who experience divorce or other family disruptions are at higher risk for a number of disadvantages, including the ones that Sullins inaccurately associates with “same-sex parented” households.


"The main point here is that Sullins uses a poor definition of "raised by" which doesn't actually mean "raised by", and which includes a disproportionate number of children affected by divorce for same-sex couples. As children were not asked who abused them, in can happen that children that Sullins describes as "raised by" same sex couples were abused by their other parent. (...)Further criticism - including criticism of the journal as low quality and pay to publish"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5204108/
https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/07/new-gay-parenting-study-is-a-dishonest-assault-on-lgbtq-families.html

"Anti-LGBT researcher who pushes harmful pseudoscience joins anti-LGBT hate group"
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/05/15/anti-lgbt-researcher-who-pushes-harmful-pseudoscience-joins-anti-lgbt-hate-group

Przypominam: konsensus naukowy w tym temacie jest znany - dzieci wychowujące się w parach jednopłciowych wychowują się prawidłowo - 75 badań: https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

#lgbt #neuropa #4konserwy #bekazprawakow #urojeniaprawakoidalne #homoseksualizm #bekazkatoli (+ #bekazlewactwa, gdyż dodał ten tag)
Pobierz artpop - Chciałem wszystkich przestrzec przed @GabrielGarciaMoreno, który dodaje pseu...
źródło: comment_1598705816IhMcE9EfwPWzy7fLfQZn6t.jpg
  • 12