@drGreen: Jedynym sposobem schudnięcia jest deficyt kaloryczny. Jak to ktoś chce osiągnąć to jego indywidualna sprawa. Jeżeli piszesz, że maja podobne lub lepsze wyniki to oznacza, że w gruncie rzeczy to i tak nie ma znaczenia. Możesz podesłać badania.
Na LFHC osoba ćwicząca na siłowni będzie wyglądała płasko. A co do chodzenia głodnym :
Istnieją także doniesienia o właściwościach sycących tłuszczów. To prawda, tłuszcze wpływają na sytość poprzez opóźnianie tempa
Assuming protein intake is optimal, does it make any noticeable difference to results if somebody is consuming a high fat diet compared to a high carb diet while trying to build mass? Is the middle ground between the two options as effective?
Probably. First of all, carbs supply energy for training and recovery like fats don’t. Secondly, Carbs lead to insulin secretion while fats don’t. This means that carb consumption triggers anabolism in muscle as well as fat tissue, but that fat consumption likely (when in excess) mostly triggers anabolism in fat tissue and not muscle. Lastly, having a high intake of carbs is both anti-catabolic and (through glycogen storage-mediated signalling pathways, for example), directly signalling to anabolic mechanisms unlike fat. Sounds like a lot, but all of these effects don’t add up to much… but not much is still something, especially over the long term. What does that translate into as far as practical recommendations? Probably getting in the minimum or just above of fat intake per day (0.3g per pound per day), getting the optimal protein (1g per pound), and then the rest of calories from carbs if you want to grow.
Na LFHC osoba ćwicząca na siłowni będzie wyglądała płasko. A co do chodzenia głodnym :
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7851362
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3411406/
Probably. First of all, carbs supply energy for training and recovery like fats don’t. Secondly, Carbs lead to insulin secretion while fats don’t. This means that carb consumption triggers anabolism in muscle as well as fat tissue, but that fat consumption likely (when in excess) mostly triggers anabolism in fat tissue and not muscle. Lastly, having a high intake of carbs is both anti-catabolic and (through glycogen storage-mediated signalling pathways, for example), directly signalling to anabolic mechanisms unlike fat. Sounds like a lot, but all of these effects don’t add up to much… but not much is still something, especially over the long term. What does that translate into as far as practical recommendations? Probably getting in the minimum or just above of fat intake per day (0.3g per pound per day), getting the optimal protein (1g per pound), and then the rest of calories from carbs if you want to grow.
Dr.