#!$%@? od tego czy sie z tym zgadzam czy nie to wklejam dosyc ciekawy opis supply-sidersow z Peddling Prosperity Krugman'a, ktory brzmi dosc znajomo ( ͡°͜ʖ͡°)
Supply-siders do not fundamentally rely on empirical evidence to back their view; they believe that their ideas are necessarily, logically, right, and that the academic majority is wrong not only about parameters but about principles.
Or to put it another way, the supply-siders are cranks. […] A crank, in Gardner’s definition, is someone who challenges scientific orthodoxy – but not in a sensible, well-informed way. Instead, he is an outsider who fails to understand what the orthodoxy is about, and/or is determined to refute the current wisdom for personal or political rather than scientific views.
Gardner identifies two defining features of the crank. First, a crank is isolated from the usual channels of discussion. “He does no send his findings to the recognized journals… He speaks before organizations he himself has founded, contributes to journals he himself may edit. […] The other characteristic of a crank, in Gardner’s discussion,is the belief that failure of the establishment to accept his ideas necessarily represents stupidity, dishonesty, or both.
Chciałbym oficjalnie NAPLUĆ z tego miejsca na każdego któremu nie chcę się dziś iść na #wybory nie zależnie od tego na kogo by zagłosował. Oczywiście podwójnie chciałbym OPLUĆ tych którym się dziś nie chcę iść ale będą pisać o polityce na mirko regularnie.
DOSKONALA BRUNETKA ? Faceci jak ona wam sie podoba ? Kobiety co myslicie o takim stylu? Te paznokcie, usta, rzesy, makijaz, piersy itd. Ocencie jej wyglad
![Ponad 1200 zł za metr wykładzin w Pendolino [stanowisko PKP IC] - Rynek Kolejowy](https://wykop.pl/cdn/c3397993/cd26f83ff5af47c5207445d6e70da3b05a770e2803d2d873b84d87c585691640,q70.jpg)
Supply-siders do not fundamentally rely on empirical evidence to back their view; they believe that their ideas are necessarily, logically, right, and that the academic majority is wrong not only about parameters but about principles.
Or to put it another way, the supply-siders are cranks. […] A crank, in Gardner’s definition, is someone who challenges scientific orthodoxy – but not in a sensible, well-informed way. Instead, he is an outsider who fails to understand what the orthodoxy is about, and/or is determined to refute the current wisdom for personal or political rather than scientific views.
Gardner identifies two defining features of the crank. First, a crank is isolated from the usual channels of discussion. “He does no send his findings to the recognized journals… He speaks before organizations he himself has founded, contributes to journals he himself may edit. […] The other characteristic of a crank, in Gardner’s discussion,is the belief that failure of the establishment to accept his ideas necessarily represents stupidity, dishonesty, or both.
#4konserwy #jkm #ekonomia